![]() ![]() You may have noticed that we set the background color to black using the hex color code #111 while our text color of #d8e0db translates to a very light tan. We added two of these - one for each line - but the black color we assigned makes them invisible for now. The white-space: nowrap setting will get our animation into a single line.įinally, the border-right property will act as our cursor, which we want to blink as the text is displayed. We set the overflow property as hidden to prevent unwanted horizontal scrolling and extra whitespace in the project. We used some CSS properties we discussed earlier for our animation to work. In our style.css file, we are trying to style both lines of our text. ![]() Overflow: hidden /* hide text behind the cursor */īorder-right: 2px solid rgba(17, 17, 17, 0.9) White-space: nowrap /* keep text in one line */ Styling the webpageĬreate another file inside the project folder called style.css and paste this: url("") įont-family: "Major Mono Display", monospace Let’s move on to styling our webpage and creating our animation. That’s all we need to do inside our index.html page. Each paragraph has its own class - first_line and second_line, respectively - as we are trying to achieve a multiline typewriter effect. We included a div container inside this file with two paragraphs of text. Inside the folder for this project, create an index.html file, which will act as our webpage for this project demo, and paste this: Setting up the projectįirst, let’s define the HTML structure for the text that we’ll animate with the typewriter effect using CSS. Meanwhile, the border-right-color property will help animate our cursor from light grey to transparent, giving the animation a realistic touch of a blinking cursor.įinally, the width property is animated from 0% to 100% to achieve the effect of each letter appearing one at a time. The white-space property will trim the animation down to a single line. Using the overflow property on our content will ensure that each word displays in accordance with the animation rather than being shown all at once. We will use for animations, as this at-rule gives us more control over the animation we want to perform. We will also have a cursor that types out the text and then continues to blink once it is done typing.īefore we dive in, let’s review some of the CSS properties we’ll be using. To achieve the typewriter effect, we will animate our text so that it displays text gradually. Overview of our typewriter CSS animation project Now let’s move on to building our typewriter effect! But if you need more control or dynamic content, JavaScript might be the better choice. If you just need a simple, static typewriter effect, CSS might be the way to go. On the other hand, JavaScript can be more complex to implement than CSS, especially for developers who are not familiar with it. JavaScript can be more flexible and adaptable than CSS, especially if you need to change the content of the animation quickly. You can fine-tune the timing of the effect and make it more dynamic. ![]() In comparison, using JavaScript offers more control over the animation. Additionally, you may not be able to handle more complex scenarios, such as changing the content of the animation on the fly. However, when using CSS only, the typewriter animation may not be as dynamic as it could be with JavaScript. This approach also uses fewer resources than JavaScript, which can be important for performance on low-end devices. Using CSS only is simpler and easier to implement than using JavaScript. Let’s go over some benefits and drawbacks of each approach to help you decide. Ultimately, the choice between CSS and JavaScript will depend on your specific needs and resources.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |